We are most pleased with the part of
cooperation of the group members.
We attend the weekly meeting regularly. We
exchange our own understandings of the poems and analyze the poems together. For
the editing process, we finish our own part on time and then the whole task
will smoothly proceed.
We have 3 major problems involved in our
jobs.
1. Criteria:
At
first, because we are the novice as editors in the poetry section; it’s hard
for us to set the criteria as different people have different opinion of what a
good poem is. After setting the criteria, it’s also hard to select poem as some
poems have their own strength while not meeting all the criteria. So we have to
make a careful choice.
2. Interpretation:
As
we are not native English speakers, it’s easy for us to wrongly interpret the
poems with confused words. Sometimes, we encounter such situation that one
member think highly of one piece of poem while another one doesn’t like it. Also,
we have the trouble that because of our interpretation of the poem is different
from what the author wants to convey, conflicts between author and editor
occur.
3. Communication:
The
editing part really requires effective communication between the editor and the
author. Our communication with the
author is not very effective. In some cases, editors fail to give clear
suggestions to the author, and haven’t clarified the problems clearly, and it causes
a problem that the revision poems that editors get are not the ones that we
want.
If we have a chance to redo it again, we
will do it differently.
1. We
will clearly define the jobs of editors and reach a
common understanding of the criteria before we begin our job.
2. Giving
more time to understand the poem, increase the confidence and effectively
communicate with the poet.
没有评论:
发表评论